SDL 04- 10/6 Scores

Post em!

Sting 04 Goodman White 7
LFCA 03G Hunt (Kim) 0

Sting 04 Goodman Blue 2
LFCA 04G RedKnapp (Springate) 1

Solar Chelsea'04 Kennington 8
LFCA '04 Paisley 1

Allen Elite 3 Dallas Texans 3

Solar Gold 3

FCD Dowell 2

socceroos wrote:Allen Elite 3 Dallas Texans 3

Is this Dallas Texans Rosales?

4DaLuvofTheGM wrote:

socceroos wrote:Allen Elite 3 Dallas Texans 3

Is this Dallas Texans Rosales?

Schedule says Scott

Eliza466 wrote:Solar Chelsea'04 Kennington 8
LFCA '04 Paisley 1

Not that it matter much but I had the score Solar 6 LP 1.

Solar scored 5 goals in first half with the wind.
In 2nd half Solar scored 1 and LP scored 1 right at end of game.

So I like to think of it as 2 games. Solar won first game 5-0. Paisley tied Solar 1-1 in the other.....lol. Pailsey played their game and didnt pack the box.

mcik17 wrote:

Eliza466 wrote:Solar Chelsea'04 Kennington 8
LFCA '04 Paisley 1

Not that it matter much but I had the score Solar 6 LP 1.

Solar scored 5 goals in first half with the wind.
In 2nd half Solar scored 1 and LP scored 1 right at end of game.

So I like to think of it as 2 games. Solar won first game 5-0. Paisley tied Solar 1-1 in the other.....lol. Pailsey played their game and didnt pack the box.

If that works for you, but the whole "packing the box" is old.

mcik17 wrote:

Eliza466 wrote:Solar Chelsea'04 Kennington 8
LFCA '04 Paisley 1

Not that it matter much but I had the score Solar 6 LP 1.

Solar scored 5 goals in first half with the wind.
In 2nd half Solar scored 1 and LP scored 1 right at end of game.

So I like to think of it as 2 games. Solar won first game 5-0. Paisley tied Solar 1-1 in the other.....lol. Pailsey played their game and didnt pack the box.

We must have been watching different games. Solar didn't pack the box. They played their passing game well, stayed spread out and passed the ball around very well.

Mcik17, that might have been one of the most amusing comments I have ever read on this board. The only box Solar was packing was LP's.........for the entire game.

Drlaura wrote:

mcik17 wrote:

Eliza466 wrote:Solar Chelsea'04 Kennington 8
LFCA '04 Paisley 1

Not that it matter much but I had the score Solar 6 LP 1.

Solar scored 5 goals in first half with the wind.
In 2nd half Solar scored 1 and LP scored 1 right at end of game.

So I like to think of it as 2 games. Solar won first game 5-0. Paisley tied Solar 1-1 in the other.....lol. Pailsey played their game and didnt pack the box.

We must have been watching different games. Solar didn't pack the box. They played their passing game well, stayed spread out and passed the ball around very well.

I wasn't at this game nor do I know anything about the game but in reading the comment I don't think Mcik17 was talking about Solar, instead I took it to mean that Paisley didnt pack the box to defend against Solar, instead they worked on keeping their shape.

Mcik17 is often misunderstood so figured I would try to help him out!

Soccer Po Boy wrote:Mcik17, that might have been one of the most amusing comments I have ever read on this board. The only box Solar was packing was LP's.........for the entire game.

My post says that Paisley didn't pack the box....maybe you shouldn't read forum late at night.

Drlaura wrote:

mcik17 wrote:

Eliza466 wrote:Solar Chelsea'04 Kennington 8
LFCA '04 Paisley 1

Not that it matter much but I had the score Solar 6 LP 1.

Solar scored 5 goals in first half with the wind.
In 2nd half Solar scored 1 and LP scored 1 right at end of game.

So I like to think of it as 2 games. Solar won first game 5-0. Paisley tied Solar 1-1 in the other.....lol. Pailsey played their game and didnt pack the box.

We must have been watching different games. Solar didn't pack the box. They played their passing game well, stayed spread out and passed the ball around very well.

Please point out where in my post I stated that Solar packed the box?

Neither team camped inside their own box.... Solar played an open, flowing style, while the L'pool team played open at spots and were punished for it.

"Packing the Box" must be a sweet spot for some Solar parents.. Must have been accused of this before... LOL

The term "with the wind" must be a sweet spot for LP parents. It must be in the book of excuses they issue when you join the club.

mcik17 wrote:

Eliza466 wrote:Solar Chelsea'04 Kennington 8
LFCA '04 Paisley 1

Not that it matter much but I had the score Solar 6 LP 1.

Solar scored 5 goals in first half with the wind.
In 2nd half Solar scored 1 and LP scored 1 right at end of game.

So I like to think of it as 2 games. Solar won first game 5-0. Paisley tied Solar 1-1 in the other.....lol. Pailsey played their game and didnt pack the box.

The most ammusing comment I have ever read on these boards. 2 games were played?? Yes, LOL!

Solar completely dominated this game with superb passing, "first to the ball", skills, controlled dribbling and just about anything else you do in soccer. Ok, maybe didn't see a header. And the girls were tested by playing in positions they normally don't. Have to ask, what field # was it?, cause we don't think you were at the same game.

mcik17 wrote:

Drlaura wrote:

mcik17 wrote:

Eliza466 wrote:Solar Chelsea'04 Kennington 8
LFCA '04 Paisley 1

Not that it matter much but I had the score Solar 6 LP 1.

Solar scored 5 goals in first half with the wind.
In 2nd half Solar scored 1 and LP scored 1 right at end of game.

So I like to think of it as 2 games. Solar won first game 5-0. Paisley tied Solar 1-1 in the other.....lol. Pailsey played their game and didnt pack the box.

We must have been watching different games. Solar didn't pack the box. They played their passing game well, stayed spread out and passed the ball around very well.

Please point out where in my post I stated that Solar packed the box?

It is hard to read your intent in your original post with your comment about you thinking of it as two games. Then you started your excuses of the wind being a factor, and that LP didn't pack the box. What was the intent of that? Because "packing the box" has been used against Solar in the past. Why not just come out and say the teams played well and give credit where credit is due? smh

Anybody know the result from the Liverpool and Solar K 6v6 yesterday?

[quote="Master Bates"]Anybody know the result from the Liverpool and Solar K 6v6 yesterday?[/quote

Now that was a fun game!! Both teams were fast and moved the ball well. However, Solar lost with a final goal in the last minute by RASE. So, 3-2 was the score. The girls had a really good time.

Sounds like a good one

Drlaura wrote:

mcik17 wrote:

Drlaura wrote:

mcik17 wrote:

Eliza466 wrote:Solar Chelsea'04 Kennington 8
LFCA '04 Paisley 1

Not that it matter much but I had the score Solar 6 LP 1.

Solar scored 5 goals in first half with the wind.
In 2nd half Solar scored 1 and LP scored 1 right at end of game.

So I like to think of it as 2 games. Solar won first game 5-0. Paisley tied Solar 1-1 in the other.....lol. Pailsey played their game and didnt pack the box.

We must have been watching different games. Solar didn't pack the box. They played their passing game well, stayed spread out and passed the ball around very well.

Please point out where in my post I stated that Solar packed the box?

It is hard to read your intent in your original post with your comment about you thinking of it as two games. Then you started your excuses of the wind being a factor, and that LP didn't pack the box. What was the intent of that? Because "packing the box" has been used against Solar in the past. Why not just come out and say the teams played well and give credit where credit is due? smh

My "intent" was to say that Paisley(which most would consider the 4th LP team) played Kennington strait up. Even though Kennington is way more superior in talent and about 20 spots higher in rankings, Paisley didn't just pack the box and try to limit scoring like other teams out matched would of probably done. We kept our forwards up connected some passes and was on your end of the field more than I thought we would of been, considering the ranking descrepancy. I'm not doubting Solar at all, matter of fact I thought they were awesome and that's why I was proud that our girls played you guys man up and actually did some great things. Do you disagree that we didn't play you guys man up? Did we pack the box? We played you guys strait up and took a butt kicking. As for the 2 games comment, what I ment was in the 2nd half both teams only scored 1 goal appiece. Against you guys, I think that is great for our team...even if you guys switched positions around. Paisley has been around for about a month in a half, we have no goalie(as you could tell by our first GK trying to stop all shots with her feet)all girls just take turns at GK like I'm sure other teams do. You guys definately were the most aggressive and won 80% of the 50-50 balls and out shot us probably 25-5. If our girls would just shoot the ball more in the 18' box instead of trying to dribble thru traffic for a clear shot, we might of made a little better game of it! Oh, and one last thing....it was windy Saturday and regardless of what you think wind does have an affect, especially when going against a team like Solar that has cannons for legs. And, of course we had the wind also in the 2nd half and mananged only 1 goal.

Drlaura wrote:

mcik17 wrote:

Drlaura wrote:

mcik17 wrote:

Eliza466 wrote:Solar Chelsea'04 Kennington 8
LFCA '04 Paisley 1

Not that it matter much but I had the score Solar 6 LP 1.

Solar scored 5 goals in first half with the wind.
In 2nd half Solar scored 1 and LP scored 1 right at end of game.

So I like to think of it as 2 games. Solar won first game 5-0. Paisley tied Solar 1-1 in the other.....lol. Pailsey played their game and didnt pack the box.

We must have been watching different games. Solar didn't pack the box. They played their passing game well, stayed spread out and passed the ball around very well.

Please point out where in my post I stated that Solar packed the box?

It is hard to read your intent in your original post with your comment about you thinking of it as two games. Then you started your excuses of the wind being a factor, and that LP didn't pack the box. What was the intent of that? Because "packing the box" has been used against Solar in the past. Why not just come out and say the teams played well and give credit where credit is due? smh

Also, I have never in my 545 posts ever said one negative thing about Solar Kennington...you can check. Whatever your beef with other LP teams is has nothing to do with me...I'm just proud of my dd and thought she did well against a awesome opponent.

mcik17 wrote:

Drlaura wrote:

mcik17 wrote:

Drlaura wrote:

mcik17 wrote:

Eliza466 wrote:Solar Chelsea'04 Kennington 8
LFCA '04 Paisley 1

Not that it matter much but I had the score Solar 6 LP 1.

Solar scored 5 goals in first half with the wind.
In 2nd half Solar scored 1 and LP scored 1 right at end of game.

So I like to think of it as 2 games. Solar won first game 5-0. Paisley tied Solar 1-1 in the other.....lol. Pailsey played their game and didnt pack the box.

We must have been watching different games. Solar didn't pack the box. They played their passing game well, stayed spread out and passed the ball around very well.

Please point out where in my post I stated that Solar packed the box?

It is hard to read your intent in your original post with your comment about you thinking of it as two games. Then you started your excuses of the wind being a factor, and that LP didn't pack the box. What was the intent of that? Because "packing the box" has been used against Solar in the past. Why not just come out and say the teams played well and give credit where credit is due? smh

Also, I have never in my 545 posts ever said one negative thing about Solar Kennington...you can check. Whatever your beef with other LP teams is has nothing to do with me...I'm just proud of my dd and thought she did well against a awesome opponent.

That is a fair statement. I don't have a beef about LP, never have, and have never said one negative thing about any teams out there. I think both teams played well, as I stated earlier, especially if your team is a new team. I appreciate your comments about SK. I think the comments were just misunderstood so thank you for clarifying your intent.

I know Mcik17 and he's a good guy. I don't think his intent was to put down Solar's play. He was just trying to give his team props which they definitely deserve. Great effort by both teams and his DD gets style points for the nice goal with only seconds left in the game.