running up the score

Im not calling for anyones head on this, but it happened. Yes, the coach new and went ahead and played the boy.

His argument was I should not care and let him play it will make my boys and his boys better.

Problem was the child in question was at such a higher level, literally no one else was touching the ball. He had possession and he kept possesion and kept shooting.

that doesnt benefit my team, or even his team for that matter. Those little guys were not touching the ball at all. once the boy was removed... what do you know, we had a soccer game on our hands... everyone touched the ball and every kid had a good time.

Borussia wrote:Im not calling for anyones head on this, but it happened.  Yes, the coach new and went ahead and played the boy.  

His argument was I should not care and let him play it will make my boys and his boys better.

Problem was the child in question was at such a higher level, literally no one else was touching the ball.  He had possession and he kept possesion and kept shooting.

that doesnt benefit my team, or even his team for that matter.  Those little guys were not touching the ball at all.  once the boy was removed...  what do you know, we had a soccer game on our hands... everyone touched the ball and every kid had a good time.

And shouldn't the teams he plays this weekend, and next, and the following weekends have the same opportunity?

At least subsequent coaches could make an educated decision on whether they want the older boy to play - because we know that the cheating coach isn't interested in a fair, fun match.


- "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

The league owner is the one that finally orderd the coach to remove the player. I did my part and the league handled it properly.. that child should not be playing down again.. if I see it, well, i know where I wont be taking my business.