Lake Highlands D3 Week 9 Predictions

canaryman wrote:Good first half to the season!

purplefrog wrote:El Clasico, hopefully you are a Feet parent, otherwise that's extremely creepy that you happend to watch a 10-year old soccer game at 8:00 am.  So, assuming you are a feet parent...your perception of the game is biased.  I know peeps close with both teams, and both said it was a close game...so quit trying to stir up trouble

ParadoxTX wrote:

purplefrog wrote:El Clasico, hopefully you are a Feet parent, otherwise that's extremely creepy that you happend to watch a 10-year old soccer game at 8:00 am.  So, assuming you are a feet parent...your perception of the game is biased.  I know peeps close with both teams, and both said it was a close game...so quit trying to stir up trouble

The SRFC game wasn't even close; either they didn't show up or couldn't put it together. As for the two players welcome to a bigger club, when you have two starters out in boots and have the depth you pull. This isn't rec no one is guaranteed playtime so for those parents that can't handle their daughters lost and felt the need to post welcome to Select, sour grapes and hope you liked it because unless you are going back to rec it isn't stopping.

tigerdad wrote:D'Feet White have no chance against SRFC without those two CPP players, but it is within the rules and SRFC could not beat those D1 players.  Those CPP players played every minute of the match including the end when the result was known.

GoalsScored wrote:I watched my DD from the sidelines play against GSSC today.  I did not hear any GSSC parent call our girls a "punk".  There was a warning from the referee given for excessive noise from GSSC parents.  In my opinion, there was too much coaching from the sidelines, but I have been guilty of that a time or two in the past.

I am not a sore loser and I do not believe that we should teach our DDs to be sore losers either.  My DD's reason for not winning the game was, "The defender kept getting in my way and that keeper stops everything." The lesson she took away from the game today is that 2 GSSC players leveled the playing field against 3 CPP.  I hope that as parents we learn good sportsmanship from our DDs and are able to congratulate the victor.

GSSC played well today.  The girls were determined and confident.  They showed themselves to be the winning team. Let's not dampen their victory with accusations that are not "comment" worthy.  

We will play each other again.  I know that both teams will be prepared and ready to go to battle with or without CPP.

GoalsScored wrote:I watched my DD from the sidelines play against GSSC today.  I did not hear any GSSC parent call our girls a "punk".  There was a warning from the referee given for excessive noise from GSSC parents.  In my opinion, there was too much coaching from the sidelines, but I have been guilty of that a time or two in the past.

I am not a sore loser and I do not believe that we should teach our DDs to be sore losers either.  My DD's reason for not winning the game was, "The defender kept getting in my way and that keeper stops everything." The lesson she took away from the game today is that 2 GSSC players leveled the playing field against 3 CPP.  I hope that as parents we learn good sportsmanship from our DDs and are able to congratulate the victor.

GSSC played well today.  The girls were determined and confident.  They showed themselves to be the winning team. Let's not dampen their victory with accusations that are not "comment" worthy.  

We will play each other again.  I know that both teams will be prepared and ready to go to battle with or without CPP.

soccerisfun wrote:Don't know what game you were watching, but one of the CPP players did NOT play all of the game.  You must have your players mixed up.

One CPP switched out with a regular forward, and was not on the field at all for the 3rd goal, so that is quite a wonder that she was involved in the scoring play.  

There were many other opportunities to score when she was on the bench - including one of the one v. one's with your goalie 1/2 way through the second, where the D'Feet player shot it wide left and your obnoxious dad yelled "in your face" to the player.

Real nice.

And unless the coach yells like a girl - he was the one screaming "cheaters" at the end of the game.

adufresne wrote:Wait.....so you're saying that D'Feeters White used guest players in order to get a winning result against the mighty SRFC who they've played multiple times before with their full roster and the largest margin of defeat in said games being 1 or 2 goals with players that SRFC no longer has and that had Feet not used guess players they would have had no chance at all to win or tie as they have done in the past? And also because Feet used guest players to fill positions for injured players, they shouldn't "whine when someone says the girls are not good enough to beat SRFC straight up." Definitely sounds rational to me. Are you for real?

HeadHaunter wrote:

adufresne wrote:Wait.....so you're saying that D'Feeters White used guest players in order to get a winning result against the mighty SRFC who they've played multiple times before with their full roster and the largest margin of defeat in said games being 1 or 2 goals with players that SRFC no longer has and that had Feet not used guess players they would have had no chance at all to win or tie as they have done in the past? And also because Feet used guest players to fill positions for injured players, they shouldn't "whine when someone says the girls are not good enough to beat SRFC straight up." Definitely sounds rational to me. Are you for real?

This here forum was not built on reality sir...  please refrain from utilizing reality as a basis for argument... 

Cleansheets wrote:This is soooooo much better than what's going on over in  the D1 realm. It's like crickets over there.