Vote - Biggest Douchebag Coach

wazup wrote:

BigErn wrote:

wazup wrote:

BigErn wrote:

Foxysoccermom wrote:Big ern claims to be a coach so that's iffy....but what we do know for sure is that he is a d-bag. Numero uno!

Former coach foxy and thanks again for your support --

As I've mentioned in the past ... I feel for ya there little lady.  It's understandable how annoying it can be to someone like yourself when people like me come on this forum and simply provide useful information without subjectivity or emotion.  

Ghastly!

Still waiting to hear about your "couple of movie channels" that cost $300 BigArse

Jesus.  Always a pleasure wazup ...  

I'm assuming you're referring to one of those typical mindless responses when you take a 1/10 of the content of a post, misinterpret it, then use it in a monotonous response to humor your cronys -- Perhaps this one (below) between BigBoy and I last month?  If so, you may wanna read back through ... maybe gain a touch of discernment so we can put this little guy to bed.  How'd that be?


BigboyBentley wrote:
Big em I think we are just frustrated w all the lack of coaching and all the rules that are in place. The smaller clubs just don't have the resources to compete at the highest levels since the system was built and designed to pad the pockets of the political machine bigs. This is true for about anything. It's just unfortunate that the elite who can pay for these type of platforms limits many...there's a reson why the soccee in NTX is broken...ypu sound like that's not your side...others don't have those opportunities.....don't says it negative it's just the truth....no one likes that.....

I wrote:
I'm with you regarding the lack of great coaching in NTX and understand your stance of frustration when it comes to new platforms and their regulations.  However, while awarding the bigs these platforms (JDL, ECNL, USSDA) certainly makes the rich, richer and may seem that this is the primary purpose, it is not.  US Club and USSF award them to the bigs because they do have licensed coaches ... they do have facilities ... they do have a history of success in each age group.  Those at the top of those organizations know that the consolidation (there is that word again) of top talent into clubs that have those criterion is paramount to the continued success of women's soccer in our country.  

When you say "the elite who can pay for these type of platforms limits many" here, I'm guessing you're referring to people with the $ (which is a strange use of the the word elite in this setting, but ok)?  If this is the case then sure, it is unfortunate that a few literally cannot afford to have their kiddo play at one of the bigs, but there are scholarship programs in place to assist those folks.  For the other 99% of us, we can afford the extra $200-$300/month to have our kids follow their passion and dreams ... just might have to give up the morning Starbucks, 4G LTE data, or a couple movie channels.  My point being here is that we don't have to have "elite" pocketbooks if we have "elite" kids.


The logic here is simple and the math is even simpler ...

The average we pay in dues/fees between the clubs my kids are involved with is ~$305/month.  A kid playing at an independent may incur little to no dues.  Just for the sake of argument, they pay no dues at all, but have leagues fees, 6 tourneys, rental facility expenses and a kit to handle (I have close friends that play for an independent in this exact situation).  Even without monthly dues, that comes to about $85/month ... which makes the discrepancy ~$220 -- well within the range mentioned here.  Now I'm not gonna bore everyone with an arbitrary cost breakdown of their morning Starbucks, data plans and movie packages because most of us are adults.  Sooo ... for the sake of us all, how bout we move on to more pertinent, grown folks talk, hmmm?

And as I already told ya (rather ironically at this point) -- I don't drink coffee and have no movie channels

great attempt at a dodge from the biggest dbag on this board

now I understand your limited comprehension of the English language, but changing from "or" in your original pompous post to "and" in your current post just shows how much of a windbag you really are

and yet, you can't admit you took a big ern on your initial post and are trying to walk it back here



So if we want to talk about affording the "costs" of select soccer (which was the initial point of discussing the affordability of our kids following their "passion and dreams") - are you trying to tell us that your total average cost for your kids to play select soccer is $305 per month? Dues, fees, indoor, tournaments, travel costs (transportation, hotel, food, per diem) . . .  Because anyone with half a brain - when determining the total (or even incremental) cost and affordability of playing select soccer, would need to include ALL costs - not just selective costs.

It IS about logic and math bigE - clearly neither of which you majored in.

Simple math dictates that all costs be included when comparing cheaper independents (who generally are not traveling to multiple tournaments each year) to "the bigs".

TatonkaBurger wrote:Look at "NickSmith".  "New" to the forum and comes out with guns blazing.

I have to abstain from voting.  Too many to just pick one.

saints510 wrote:

TatonkaBurger wrote:Look at "NickSmith".  "New" to the forum and comes out with guns blazing.

I have to abstain from voting.  Too many to just pick one.

He joined on 4/20...maybe he had a momentary loss of reasoning, cuz he got high...