LHGCL 2nd half

CPP is not a new thing.  As long as it has been around, the big clubs have used it to win games.  Quit crying.

Solar Haylock was up in OKC playing Premier League matches with the OK Energy teams. Certain they were not lending players out.

Thanks Tatonka. As I have said before nobody is crying and certainly not me. Delta posted that Angel would never do such a thing as to use CPP which was proven not to be true literally the next day. Now they just beat a team 6-1 that beat them in the fall. The rules allow it so more power to them, just don’t pretend like you aren’t. Preciate ya though!

ColtMcVince wrote:Thanks Tatonka.  As I have said before nobody is crying and certainly not me.  Delta posted that Angel would never do such a thing as to use CPP which was proven not to be true literally the next day.  Now they just beat a team 6-1 that beat them in the fall.  The rules allow it so more power to them, just don’t pretend like you aren’t.  Preciate ya though!

I dont need to defend a team that has played hard all year.... but I will.

This squad only had 4 players on it that were here last year. GK, a defender, a mid, and a forward... every other player is new to the team including one that came straight from rec... they have played hard and well over the season but struggled as a new team would against established squads.

That said with the exception of one match in the fall they were in every match. The loss against Covey in the fall you want to harp on... feet led nearly the entire match 1-0... with putting literally 4 off the post inside the first 10 minutes of the match... could have been a route for feet in the first match... their target forward got two late late in the match, one on a foul kick that won it for them... I have the video if you care to watch it... so not a stretch that a squad dropped 6 on them, and i do not mean that as a knock....

5 of the 6 goals were scored by Angells players. Great game from those two.. one having a hat trick.

one or two players can make a huge difference in small sided play.. 11v11 is a different story....

solar brought in their own CPP, LP elite was set to use two CPP...

its part of the game now.... oh well.

Its been a fun season... I know my little 06 and the other three on this squad benefited greatly playing up this season... .

TatonkaBurger wrote:CPP is not a new thing.  As long as it has been around, the big clubs have used it to win games.  Quit crying.

I second that. Tis the season for CPP, especially now with Byes on the line.

AtThePitch wrote:

ColtMcVince wrote:Thanks Tatonka.  As I have said before nobody is crying and certainly not me.  Delta posted that Angel would never do such a thing as to use CPP which was proven not to be true literally the next day.  Now they just beat a team 6-1 that beat them in the fall.  The rules allow it so more power to them, just don’t pretend like you aren’t.  Preciate ya though!

I dont need to defend a team that has played hard all year.... but I will.

This squad only had 4 players on it that were here last year.  GK, a defender, a mid, and a forward... every other player is new to the team including one that came straight from rec... they have played hard and well over the season but struggled as a new team would against established squads.

That said with the exception of one match in the fall they were in every match.  The loss against Covey in the fall you want to harp on... feet led nearly the entire match 1-0... with putting literally 4 off the post inside the first 10 minutes of the match... could have been a route for feet in the first match... their target forward got two late late in the match, one on a foul kick that won it for them... I have the video if you care to watch it... so not a stretch that a squad dropped 6 on them, and i do not mean that as a knock....

5 of the 6 goals were scored by Angells players.  Great game from those two.. one having a hat trick.

one or two players can make a huge difference in small sided play.. 11v11 is a different story....  

solar brought in their own CPP, LP elite was set to use two CPP...

its part of the game now.... oh well.  

Its been a fun season...  I know my little 06 and the other three on this squad benefited greatly playing up this season... .    

Color me skeptical.  But it sounds like this team has struggled to keep up in D1. So why not let them be relegated to a lower division that probably better suits the team's skill level? Or, if they are truly developing, fight on their own to remain in D1. But instead, you bring in ringers to win games and avoid relegation?
And it's hard to argue that 1 or 2 don't make a difference,  when clearly they have,...TWICE. But as you stated, it's part of the game. And it's here to stay.  It does make for good forum debate so please continue.

ColtMcVince wrote:Thanks Tatonka.  As I have said before nobody is crying and certainly not me.  Delta posted that Angel would never do such a thing as to use CPP which was proven not to be true literally the next day.  Now they just beat a team 6-1 that beat them in the fall.  The rules allow it so more power to them, just don’t pretend like you aren’t.  Preciate ya though!

Actually Delta said he didn’t feel as if RA would use CPP given the fact that isn’t how he rolls. Not that RA doesn’t ever use them and wouldn’t. So....

05DD wrote:

AtThePitch wrote:

ColtMcVince wrote:Thanks Tatonka.  As I have said before nobody is crying and certainly not me.  Delta posted that Angel would never do such a thing as to use CPP which was proven not to be true literally the next day.  Now they just beat a team 6-1 that beat them in the fall.  The rules allow it so more power to them, just don’t pretend like you aren’t.  Preciate ya though!

I dont need to defend a team that has played hard all year.... but I will.

This squad only had 4 players on it that were here last year.  GK, a defender, a mid, and a forward... every other player is new to the team including one that came straight from rec... they have played hard and well over the season but struggled as a new team would against established squads.

That said with the exception of one match in the fall they were in every match.  The loss against Covey in the fall you want to harp on... feet led nearly the entire match 1-0... with putting literally 4 off the post inside the first 10 minutes of the match... could have been a route for feet in the first match... their target forward got two late late in the match, one on a foul kick that won it for them... I have the video if you care to watch it... so not a stretch that a squad dropped 6 on them, and i do not mean that as a knock....

5 of the 6 goals were scored by Angells players.  Great game from those two.. one having a hat trick.

one or two players can make a huge difference in small sided play.. 11v11 is a different story....  

solar brought in their own CPP, LP elite was set to use two CPP...

its part of the game now.... oh well.  

Its been a fun season...  I know my little 06 and the other three on this squad benefited greatly playing up this season... .    

Color me skeptical.  But it sounds like this team has struggled to keep up in D1. So why not let them be relegated to a lower division that probably better suits the team's skill level? Or, if they are truly developing, fight on their own to remain in D1. But instead, you bring in ringers to win games and avoid relegation?
And it's hard to argue that 1 or 2 don't make a difference,  when clearly they have,...TWICE. But as you stated, it's part of the game. And it's here to stay.  It does make for good forum debate so please continue.

Really?

KeeperCommander wrote:

05DD wrote:

AtThePitch wrote:

ColtMcVince wrote:Thanks Tatonka.  As I have said before nobody is crying and certainly not me.  Delta posted that Angel would never do such a thing as to use CPP which was proven not to be true literally the next day.  Now they just beat a team 6-1 that beat them in the fall.  The rules allow it so more power to them, just don’t pretend like you aren’t.  Preciate ya though!

I dont need to defend a team that has played hard all year.... but I will.

This squad only had 4 players on it that were here last year.  GK, a defender, a mid, and a forward... every other player is new to the team including one that came straight from rec... they have played hard and well over the season but struggled as a new team would against established squads.

That said with the exception of one match in the fall they were in every match.  The loss against Covey in the fall you want to harp on... feet led nearly the entire match 1-0... with putting literally 4 off the post inside the first 10 minutes of the match... could have been a route for feet in the first match... their target forward got two late late in the match, one on a foul kick that won it for them... I have the video if you care to watch it... so not a stretch that a squad dropped 6 on them, and i do not mean that as a knock....

5 of the 6 goals were scored by Angells players.  Great game from those two.. one having a hat trick.

one or two players can make a huge difference in small sided play.. 11v11 is a different story....  

solar brought in their own CPP, LP elite was set to use two CPP...

its part of the game now.... oh well.  

Its been a fun season...  I know my little 06 and the other three on this squad benefited greatly playing up this season... .    

Color me skeptical.  But it sounds like this team has struggled to keep up in D1. So why not let them be relegated to a lower division that probably better suits the team's skill level? Or, if they are truly developing, fight on their own to remain in D1. But instead, you bring in ringers to win games and avoid relegation?
And it's hard to argue that 1 or 2 don't make a difference,  when clearly they have,...TWICE. But as you stated, it's part of the game. And it's here to stay.  It does make for good forum debate so please continue.

Really?  

Money Money Money the dreams keep selling.

AtThePitch wrote:

I dont need to defend a team that has played hard all year.... but I will.

This squad only had 4 players on it that were here last year.  GK, a defender, a mid, and a forward... every other player is new to the team including one that came straight from rec... they have played hard and well over the season but struggled as a new team would against established squads.


Its been a fun season...  I know my little 06 and the other three on this squad benefited greatly playing up this season... .    

I was going to just lurk and not post, but I do have to comment on this. This squad is the result of two squads coming together. So the old Feet/Kicks team brought 4, I guess. By my count, there are at least 6, and maybe another 2 (not sure about their actual name vs nickname) from RA's team from last year, so yes, there is the factor of the girls getting used to each other and coming together, but to put it the way you have is misrepresenting things.

Honestly, we had a good-not-great experience with RA's team. I would not discourage anyone from playing for him, but I would also not discourage anyone from looking around either.

As far as CPP, I find it amusing that so many people have such strong opinions on it. It's everywhere, and it's not going to change. Someone said specific Solar teams don't do it, but the ones I think they were talking about definitely do. If I have the wrong teams in mind there, sorry for the mistake.

I’ll clear it up for ya. Solar Haylock does not. Not 1 player all year including the state cup (with the exception of a backup goalie that was added for emergency purposes only) where it seems teams playing in it resemble the team that played in the league by name only. It’s allowed so it is what it is.

Regarding the other team from Solar. I can’t comment with any confidence. I assumed not Bc of their results and not sure where the players would come from.

05girls wrote:I’ll clear it up for ya.  Solar Haylock does not.  Not 1 player all year including the state cup (with the exception of a backup goalie that was added for emergency purposes only) where it seems teams playing in it resemble the team that played in the league by name only.  It’s allowed so it is what it is.  

Regarding the other team from Solar.  I can’t comment with any confidence.  I assumed not Bc of their results and not sure where the players would come from.  

Ohhh pllllease! This team goes thru more playas in a week than foxy does in a month.

Uhhh, ok. If you say so.

Lake Highlands is a joke that's for sure. These coaches pad their teams so they can feel good about themselves when they wake up every morning. Look at what I did yesterday. The parents are wondering why Peggy Sue cryin.

I was wandering about the fields this week during state cup, Solar played a heck of a game against the feet ECNL squad. Surprised that ECNL team was ranked so low in those state cup brackets.

It was seeded based on league finish. The feet team that showed up for that game resembled their league team in no way whatsoever.

05girls wrote:I’ll clear it up for ya.  Solar Haylock does not.  Not 1 player all year including the state cup (with the exception of a backup goalie that was added for emergency purposes only) where it seems teams playing in it resemble the team that played in the league by name only.  It’s allowed so it is what it is.  

Regarding the other team from Solar.  I can’t comment with any confidence.  I assumed not Bc of their results and not sure where the players would come from.  

Crystal clear....

I’ll try to dumb it down more for you next time

05girls wrote:I’ll try to dumb it down more for you next time

You're one feisty seniorita. Go girl!

05girls wrote:I’ll try to dumb it down more for you next time

I believe his point was you dumbed it down already.

KeeperCommander wrote:

05girls wrote:I’ll try to dumb it down more for you next time

I believe his point was you dumbed it down already.  

Bodhisattva appreciates your support...

No way Bells is bigger than Waimea, bro...