9/7-8 Scores

FCD Premier 1
LP Barnes 0

That's what happens when you outshoot your opponent 14 shots to 4, they shoot well but you don't hit the side of WalMart. Congrats to FCD premier, their consolidation has improved their top team to a level above last season.

Sting East Chacon White - 2
Dallas Rush Deleon - 0
Score does not reflect actual game, margin should have been much larger. Sting keeper never touched the ball the entire first half, then only three times in second.

Cleansheets wrote:Sting East Chacon White - 2
Dallas Rush Deleon - 0
Score does not reflect actual game, margin should have been much larger. Sting keeper never touched the ball the entire first half, then only three times in second.

Doesn't say that much for Sting's offense if that was the case.

FieldofDreams wrote:

Cleansheets wrote:Sting East Chacon White - 2
Dallas Rush Deleon - 0
Score does not reflect actual game, margin should have been much larger. Sting keeper never touched the ball the entire first half, then only three times in second.

Doesn't say that much for Sting's offense if that was the case.

Both goals that Sting scored were fluke goals, so it is true that the score did not reflect the actual game.

How about some scores without the excuses.

04KeeperDad wrote:How about some scores without the excuses.

No excuses Sting won 2-0 end of story just don't try to talk your team up is all I'm saying.

Looks like Barnes is NOT the new #2!!!!!! Does Sting finally have the right mix to be in the mix for a top spot? DTS/ Dalglish post your darn scores!!!!!

TX Spirit Red - 3
FC Dallas Kang - 0

Score is not indicative of the actual game... great PK save by Spirit GK.

TBGsoccer wrote:

FieldofDreams wrote:

Cleansheets wrote:Sting East Chacon White - 2
Dallas Rush Deleon - 0
Score does not reflect actual game, margin should have been much larger. Sting keeper never touched the ball the entire first half, then only three times in second.

Doesn't say that much for Sting's offense if that was the case.

Both goals that Sting scored were fluke goals, so it is true that the score did not reflect the actual game.

Fluke goals? Yeah right, I don't know what game you were watching. Sure, Sting was a little slow to get their offense going but otherwise dominated ball control and shots on goal.

Dalglish 4
Odessey 0

GSSC 2
Sparta 0

LFS DTS game was canceled due to select conflicts with DTS coach.

Cleansheets wrote:

TBGsoccer wrote:

FieldofDreams wrote:

Cleansheets wrote:Sting East Chacon White - 2
Dallas Rush Deleon - 0
Score does not reflect actual game, margin should have been much larger. Sting keeper never touched the ball the entire first half, then only three times in second.

Doesn't say that much for Sting's offense if that was the case.

Both goals that Sting scored were fluke goals, so it is true that the score did not reflect the actual game.

Fluke goals? Yeah right, I don't know what game you were watching. Sure, Sting was a little slow to get their offense going but otherwise dominated ball control  and shots on goal.

Yea, you're right, they did. So what. But to post and bash about a team's lack of ball possession while your team walks away with only 2 goals doesn't say too much about Sting's offensive game or inability to finish a play. If you count all those shots-on-trees as goals, then the margin of victory would have been something like 10-0, give or take.  

Cleansheets wrote:

TBGsoccer wrote:

FieldofDreams wrote:

Cleansheets wrote:Sting East Chacon White - 2
Dallas Rush Deleon - 0
Score does not reflect actual game, margin should have been much larger. Sting keeper never touched the ball the entire first half, then only three times in second.

Doesn't say that much for Sting's offense if that was the case.

Both goals that Sting scored were fluke goals, so it is true that the score did not reflect the actual game.

Fluke goals? Yeah right, I don't know what game you were watching. Sure, Sting was a little slow to get their offense going but otherwise dominated ball control and shots on goal.

If you want to watch a team dominate ball control go watch RASE play, what you saw was kick-n-run buddy.

FieldofDreams wrote:

Cleansheets wrote:

TBGsoccer wrote:

FieldofDreams wrote:

Cleansheets wrote:Sting East Chacon White - 2
Dallas Rush Deleon - 0
Score does not reflect actual game, margin should have been much larger. Sting keeper never touched the ball the entire first half, then only three times in second.

Doesn't say that much for Sting's offense if that was the case.

Both goals that Sting scored were fluke goals, so it is true that the score did not reflect the actual game.

Fluke goals? Yeah right, I don't know what game you were watching. Sure, Sting was a little slow to get their offense going but otherwise dominated ball control  and shots on goal.

Yea, you're right, they did. So what. But to post and bash about a team's lack of ball possession while your team walks away with only 2 goals doesn't say too much about Sting's offensive game or inability to finish a play. If you count all those shots-on-trees as goals, then the margin of victory would have been something like 10-0, give or take.  

TBGsoccer wrote:

Cleansheets wrote:

TBGsoccer wrote:

FieldofDreams wrote:

Cleansheets wrote:Sting East Chacon White - 2
Dallas Rush Deleon - 0
Score does not reflect actual game, margin should have been much larger. Sting keeper never touched the ball the entire first half, then only three times in second.

Doesn't say that much for Sting's offense if that was the case.

Both goals that Sting scored were fluke goals, so it is true that the score did not reflect the actual game.

Fluke goals? Yeah right, I don't know what game you were watching. Sure, Sting was a little slow to get their offense going but otherwise dominated ball control and shots on goal.

If you want to watch a team dominate ball control go watch RASE play, what you saw was kick-n-run buddy.

Don't worry about RASE, worry about your new team coach.

Was a complete domination by sting chacon IMO. We didn't play the best, but still were far superior. Don't really know if Deleon belongs w the big girls. Also TBGsoccer.... That rings a bell, doesn't that stand for Texas Black Gold soccer?? As in Texas Black Gold soccer team, as in Deleons original team. Which means we have Coach Deleon as TBG soccer taking up for his new team Dallas black Gold Texans Rush sting club.

Let the parents do the talking and have fun. Our team dominated and keeper didn't even get in the action.

soccerallday17 wrote:Was a complete domination by sting chacon IMO. We didn't play the best, but still were far superior. Don't really know if Deleon belongs w the big girls. Also TBGsoccer.... That rings a bell, doesn't that stand for Texas Black Gold soccer?? As in Texas Black Gold soccer team, as in Deleons original team. Which means we have Coach Deleon as TBG soccer taking up for his new team Dallas black Gold Texans Rush sting club.

Let the parents do the talking and have fun. Our team dominated and keeper didn't even get in the action.

A top-10 team that hardly completed 3 passes in a row with only 2 goals is domination? C'mon man! Domination on one side of the field, yes. Domination in terms of clean passing, receiving, multiple touchs and goals like an LFS, Scott or Barnes team...far from it. Good luck when you play them! Big kick-and-run won't work for your team against others.

In my experience, when someone says, "we should've beat them by more" or "score doesn't indicate how the game actually went", it's just another way of saying our team isn't as good as we think it is, or at least it wasn't on that day.

ballboy wrote:In my experience, when someone says, "we should've beat them by more" or "score doesn't indicate how the game actually went", it's just another way of saying our team isn't as good as we think it is.

Nice diagnosis Dr. Freud.

Cleansheets wrote:

ballboy wrote:In my experience, when someone says, "we should've beat them by more" or "score doesn't indicate how the game actually went", it's just another way of saying our team isn't as good as we think it is.  

Nice diagnosis Dr. Freud.

Thank you. I'll be here all week. Good luck to your DD today. A win today will be very respectable and a nice way to round out Week 1 of the Fall.

ballboy wrote:

Cleansheets wrote:

ballboy wrote:In my experience, when someone says, "we should've beat them by more" or "score doesn't indicate how the game actually went", it's just another way of saying our team isn't as good as we think it is.  

Nice diagnosis Dr. Freud.

Thank you. I'll be here all week. Good luck to your DD today. A win today will be very respectable and a nice way to round out Week 1 of the Fall.

To funny, thanks for the well wishes and same to your DD. All in good fun.

Excellent and accurate statement. I have used that statement many times and realize the harsh truth after the fact. Greatness Ballboy

Like I said all in good fun, we all still love each other but I gotta bail on this conversation George Orwell just called.

Sting Chacon 2 - 0 Rush Deleon????  So was Piper players on this roster???  Or did they realize they were taken on "dead weight".  So Chacon dominated ball control and dominated shots on goal????  but only managed 2 goals on a #19 ranked team????  If your comments are correct, what does that say of accuracy on shots???  TBG's assessment of kick ball tactic might seem a bit more accurate hence the 5 offside calls.  Great coaching by Deleon in countering the kick ball tactics.  So in words of the great roman filosofer-Gallo, "if you cant get the ball in the net, it don't count".  shoulda, woulda coulda get you what Cleansheets?  2-0.

I think I sprained my eyes

TBGsoccer is Deleon, he can let everyone know his counter attack tactics. And u talk about rankings like they mean something. It means nothing a beginning of year.... Ask Florida, or UT, or Georgia football teams if the rankings matter at the beginning....