CPP Question

rockindaddy wrote:

futbollove wrote:

rockindaddy wrote:If the girls had adopted the same exact rules, instead of the hundreds if not thousands of posts on this board it would have probably been reduced to 10 or twenty. It's amazing how much more since the boys makes.

It makes no SENSE that LH girls league didn't take the number of post on txsoccer.net into consideration before adopting this rule. Those guys are just clueless about soccer.

Don't know how you came to that conclusion by reading my post. I was only stating that the boys rule make more SENSE. If you can't see that then so be it.

Read the first 8 words ( sounds like you may need to do it slowly)

rockindaddy wrote:

futbollove wrote:

rockindaddy wrote:If the girls had adopted the same exact rules, instead of the hundreds if not thousands of posts on this board it would have probably been reduced to 10 or twenty. It's amazing how much more since the boys makes.

It makes no SENSE that LH girls league didn't take the number of post on txsoccer.net into consideration before adopting this rule. Those guys are just clueless about soccer.

Don't know how you came to that conclusion by reading my post. I was only stating that the boys rule make more SENSE. If you can't see that then so be it.

Do you still not see how I came to that conclusion?
I doubt the number of post was a topic of conversation when they were voting on the rule.

rockindaddy wrote:

rockindaddy wrote:

futbollove wrote:

rockindaddy wrote:If the girls had adopted the same exact rules, instead of the hundreds if not thousands of posts on this board it would have probably been reduced to 10 or twenty. It's amazing how much more since the boys makes.

It makes no SENSE that LH girls league didn't take the number of post on txsoccer.net into consideration before adopting this rule. Those guys are just clueless about soccer.

Don't know how you came to that conclusion by reading my post. I was only stating that the boys rule make more SENSE. If you can't see that then so be it.

Read the first 8 words ( sounds like you may need to do it slowly)

If the girls had adopted the same exact - I had to go ahead and read the 9th word for this to make any CENTS. And I read it very sloooowwwwllllyyy.

rockindaddy - Just giving you a hard time - for the sake of the 99's.

CPP - COLLUSION PLAYER PASS?

Let's review

Is Sting Parker vying for the D1 championship?   YES
Is Andro vying for the D1 championship?  YES
Is Sting Garrett fighting to stay in D1? YES

If Sting Garrett beats or ties Andro will it help Sting Garrett stay in D1? YES
If Sting Garrett beats or ties Andro will it hurt Andro's championsip bid? YES
If Sting Garrett beats or ties Andro will it help Sting Parker's championship bid? YES
Even if Sting Garrett loses to Andro, could it still help Sting Parker's championship bid by altering the final GF, GA, totals and therefore alter the final standings? YES.

Is this a screaming, yelling, wreaking stinking mess of an example of COLLUSION?  YES

Do the rules allow it?   YES

CONCLUSION (call it the collusion conclusion)

The problem isn't that Sting Garrett did this.
The problem isn't that Sting Parker did this.
The problem IS, the COLLUSION PLAYER PASS RULE allows this.

OLJW wrote:CPP - COLLUSION PLAYER PASS?

Let's review

Is Sting Parker vying for the D1 championship?   YES
Is Andro vying for the D1 championship?  YES
Is Sting Garrett fighting to stay in D1? YES

If Sting Garrett beats or ties Andro will it help Sting Garrett stay in D1? YES
If Sting Garrett beats or ties Andro will it hurt Andro's championsip bid? YES
If Sting Garrett beats or ties Andro will it help Sting Parker's championship bid? YES
Even if Sting Garrett loses to Andro, could it still help Sting Parker's championship bid by altering the final GF, GA, totals and therefore alter the final standings? YES.

Is this a screaming, yelling, wreaking stinking mess of an example of COLLUSION?  YES

Do the rules allow it?   YES

CONCLUSION (call it the collusion conclusion)

The problem isn't that Sting Garrett did this.
The problem isn't that Sting Parker did this.
The problem IS, the COLLUSION PLAYER PASS RULE allows this.

Thank goodness, someone gets it.

The problem isn't that Sting Ferretti did this.
The problem isn't that Sting Bruno did this.

Just thought I would make it a little more in-collusive.  Lol   Don't get bent. Columbo (or is it Nancy Drew?) here just trying to be funny. What I would add though Josey is that just because you can doesn't mean you should..

I think we are all in agreement that the rule itself is all over the board and way too broad. It is very much a "kid in the candy shop" rule. The problem is that there are a lot of teams using it to gain advantage. So, either the rule needs to be radically changed or rescinded. And on a side note, "Will the world ever be fair to KnK?"