Re: Final SDL Standings - Week 8

by DEUCEE'Sdaddy 08/11/11, 02:54 pm

Moosh98 wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:The Only "Problem" w/Dalglish is the Insistence of their Parents on Being Ranked as on '04 Squad, while Playing '03's...If U're Playing '03's Primarily, THAT's Where You Should Be Ranked...

Beating Mid or Lower Level '03's SHOULDN'T Carry Tooo Much Weight in an '04 Specific Ranking...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

If an 05 team was to beat Keegan, Tx Spirit North, Beardsley and DTS in the 04s, would that not carry any weight for their rankings in the 05s?

And better yet, if they were able to be very competitive against Rosales and solar Kenn. I think you have to factor in everything.

"Competitive" Is Open to Interpretation...Is 3-1 Competitive???...5-2???...I have No Idea what the Scores were in Dalglish's Games vs. Elite '03's, F.Y.I, just Saying...

What I DO Know is, Dalglish & Solar TIED the Last Time they Played, Whereas Rosales BEAT Solar the Last Time they Played...& TBG Tied Rosales, yet Lost to Solar...There's Really NO Consensus # 1 '04 Team, yet Only 1 Group Seems to Complain about NOT Being Ranked # 1, while Spending the Bulk of their Time Playing '03's...

DEUCEE'sdaddy Cool

by Moosh98 08/11/11, 02:56 pm

DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:The Only "Problem" w/Dalglish is the Insistence of their Parents on Being Ranked as on '04 Squad, while Playing '03's...If U're Playing '03's Primarily, THAT's Where You Should Be Ranked...

Beating Mid or Lower Level '03's SHOULDN'T Carry Tooo Much Weight in an '04 Specific Ranking...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

If an 05 team was to beat Keegan, Tx Spirit North, Beardsley and DTS in the 04s, would that not carry any weight for their rankings in the 05s?
Depends on how that '05 Fared Against the Rowdies, TBG, Solar-Kennington & Rosales...Not to Mention How that Same '05 Squad Fared Against Other '05's

What YOU'RE Basically Saying is, "Dalglish MUST Be the Best '04 Team, Because we Compete w/Mid & Lower Level '03's"...But that's NOT Necessarily a Factual Statement...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

Thats nice. keep saying "mid and lower level" We have played many teams in the top 10 and top 5. but anyway.... my point was actually about simply being RANKED in their own age group, not WHERE they are ranked in that age group

by Moosh98 08/11/11, 02:57 pm

DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:The Only "Problem" w/Dalglish is the Insistence of their Parents on Being Ranked as on '04 Squad, while Playing '03's...If U're Playing '03's Primarily, THAT's Where You Should Be Ranked...

Beating Mid or Lower Level '03's SHOULDN'T Carry Tooo Much Weight in an '04 Specific Ranking...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

If an 05 team was to beat Keegan, Tx Spirit North, Beardsley and DTS in the 04s, would that not carry any weight for their rankings in the 05s?

And better yet, if they were able to be very competitive against Rosales and solar Kenn. I think you have to factor in everything.
"Competitive" Is Open to Interpretation...Is 3-1 Competitive???...5-2???...I have No Idea what the Scores were in Dalglish's Games vs. Elite '03's, F.Y.I, just Saying...

What I DO Know is, Dalglish & Solar TIED the Last Time they Played, Whereas Rosales BEAT Solar the Last Time they Played...& TBG Tied Rosales, yet Lost to Solar...There's Really NO Consensus # 1 '04 Team, yet Only 1 Group Seems to Complain about NOT Being Ranked # 1, while Spending the Bulk of their Time Playing '03's...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

We played solar 9v9 and against their stud 03 keeper. in the 04 division it was 7v7 and Solars 04 keeper. Not the same

by Moosh98 08/11/11, 02:58 pm

gotta go! enjoy!

by KSD 08/11/11, 03:04 pm

Moosh98 wrote:gotta go! enjoy!

You're no fun Moosh! I had just grabbed some popcorn and drink.

by Moosh98 08/11/11, 03:08 pm

kellersoccerdad wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:gotta go! enjoy!

You're no fun Moosh! I had just grabbed some popcorn and drink.

We'll discuss later. Wink

gotta grab the kids

by DEUCEE'Sdaddy 08/11/11, 03:10 pm

Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:The Only "Problem" w/Dalglish is the Insistence of their Parents on Being Ranked as on '04 Squad, while Playing '03's...If U're Playing '03's Primarily, THAT's Where You Should Be Ranked...

Beating Mid or Lower Level '03's SHOULDN'T Carry Tooo Much Weight in an '04 Specific Ranking...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

If an 05 team was to beat Keegan, Tx Spirit North, Beardsley and DTS in the 04s, would that not carry any weight for their rankings in the 05s?
Depends on how that '05 Fared Against the Rowdies, TBG, Solar-Kennington & Rosales...Not to Mention How that Same '05 Squad Fared Against Other '05's

What YOU'RE Basically Saying is, "Dalglish MUST Be the Best '04 Team, Because we Compete w/Mid & Lower Level '03's"...But that's NOT Necessarily a Factual Statement...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

Thats nice. keep saying "mid and lower level" We have played many teams in the top 10 and top 5. but anyway.... my point was actually about simply being RANKED in their own age group, not WHERE they are ranked in that age group

I'm Honestly NOT Trying to Piss You or Anybody Else Off Here, but this is a Clear Case of HAVING your Cake & Wanting to EAT it Too...

Have ya'll BEATEN Any Elite Level '03's???...Serious Question???..."Playing" & "Beating" are Entirely Different Matters, Especially when you're Campaigning for a High Ranking in a Different Age Bracket...

DEUCEE'sdaddy Cool

by KSD 08/11/11, 03:16 pm

DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:The Only "Problem" w/Dalglish is the Insistence of their Parents on Being Ranked as on '04 Squad, while Playing '03's...If U're Playing '03's Primarily, THAT's Where You Should Be Ranked...

Beating Mid or Lower Level '03's SHOULDN'T Carry Tooo Much Weight in an '04 Specific Ranking...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

If an 05 team was to beat Keegan, Tx Spirit North, Beardsley and DTS in the 04s, would that not carry any weight for their rankings in the 05s?
Depends on how that '05 Fared Against the Rowdies, TBG, Solar-Kennington & Rosales...Not to Mention How that Same '05 Squad Fared Against Other '05's

What YOU'RE Basically Saying is, "Dalglish MUST Be the Best '04 Team, Because we Compete w/Mid & Lower Level '03's"...But that's NOT Necessarily a Factual Statement...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

Thats nice. keep saying "mid and lower level" We have played many teams in the top 10 and top 5. but anyway.... my point was actually about simply being RANKED in their own age group, not WHERE they are ranked in that age group
I'm Honestly NOT Trying to Piss You or Anybody Else Off Here, but this is a Clear Case of HAVING your Cake & Wanting to EAT it Too...

Have ya'll BEATEN Any Elite Level '03's???...Serious Question???..."Playing" & "Beating" are Entirely Different Matters, Especially when you're Campaigning for a High Ranking in a Different Age Bracket...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

Let's see how the weekend plays out, DEUCEE'sdaddy. Y'all get your shot at Dalglish first.

by TCUDad 08/11/11, 03:21 pm

Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:The Only "Problem" w/Dalglish is the Insistence of their Parents on Being Ranked as on '04 Squad, while Playing '03's...If U're Playing '03's Primarily, THAT's Where You Should Be Ranked...

Beating Mid or Lower Level '03's SHOULDN'T Carry Tooo Much Weight in an '04 Specific Ranking...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

If an 05 team was to beat Keegan, Tx Spirit North, Beardsley and DTS in the 04s, would that not carry any weight for their rankings in the 05s?

And better yet, if they were able to be very competitive against Rosales and solar Kenn. I think you have to factor in everything.
"Competitive" Is Open to Interpretation...Is 3-1 Competitive???...5-2???...I have No Idea what the Scores were in Dalglish's Games vs. Elite '03's, F.Y.I, just Saying...

What I DO Know is, Dalglish & Solar TIED the Last Time they Played, Whereas Rosales BEAT Solar the Last Time they Played...& TBG Tied Rosales, yet Lost to Solar...There's Really NO Consensus # 1 '04 Team, yet Only 1 Group Seems to Complain about NOT Being Ranked # 1, while Spending the Bulk of their Time Playing '03's...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

We played solar 9v9 and against their stud 03 keeper. in the 04 division it was 7v7 and Solars 04 keeper. Not the same

But it was also confirmed on here by your own parents that during that Solar game, Dalglish also played with an 03 goalie and also used three or four top 03 field players from one of Lee's other teams. The Solar goalie was the only 03 player that Solar used.

Deucee's Daddy makes a great point. Those teams are all pretty close, but only one team is complaining about their ranking.

by Moosh98 08/11/11, 03:31 pm

TCUDad wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:The Only "Problem" w/Dalglish is the Insistence of their Parents on Being Ranked as on '04 Squad, while Playing '03's...If U're Playing '03's Primarily, THAT's Where You Should Be Ranked...

Beating Mid or Lower Level '03's SHOULDN'T Carry Tooo Much Weight in an '04 Specific Ranking...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

If an 05 team was to beat Keegan, Tx Spirit North, Beardsley and DTS in the 04s, would that not carry any weight for their rankings in the 05s?

And better yet, if they were able to be very competitive against Rosales and solar Kenn. I think you have to factor in everything.
"Competitive" Is Open to Interpretation...Is 3-1 Competitive???...5-2???...I have No Idea what the Scores were in Dalglish's Games vs. Elite '03's, F.Y.I, just Saying...

What I DO Know is, Dalglish & Solar TIED the Last Time they Played, Whereas Rosales BEAT Solar the Last Time they Played...& TBG Tied Rosales, yet Lost to Solar...There's Really NO Consensus # 1 '04 Team, yet Only 1 Group Seems to Complain about NOT Being Ranked # 1, while Spending the Bulk of their Time Playing '03's...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

We played solar 9v9 and against their stud 03 keeper. in the 04 division it was 7v7 and Solars 04 keeper. Not the same

But it was also confirmed on here by your own parents that during that Solar game, Dalglish also played with an 03 goalie and also used three or four top 03 field players from one of Lee's other teams. The Solar goalie was the only 03 player that Solar used.

Deucee's Daddy makes a great point. Those teams are all pretty close, but only one team is complaining about their ranking.

For the last time!!! I was NOT discussing WHERE they should be ranked. Only that they SHOULD be ranked in the 04 rankings!

by Moosh98 08/11/11, 03:38 pm

And for the record, dalglish and solar have played 3 times in the last year. Dalglish won 2 and one tie. They have played twice in the last 3 or 4 months. One win for dalglish and a tie. Solar has not beaten Dalglish. Has any of the top teams lost to Solar? And what does all this mean? Absolutely nothing

by LoneStar 08/11/11, 03:42 pm

I will speak for the Liverpool Daglish team, please do not rank us or talk about us. If one of our parents decides to voice a thought on us, please ignore and move on.

by Shelby427 08/11/11, 03:55 pm

LoneStar wrote:I will speak for the Liverpool Daglish team, please do not rank us or talk about us. If one our parents decides to voice a thought on us, please ignore and move on.

LOL.. good luck with that.

Dalglish will get ranked as all teams get ranked. Nothing wrong with rankings discussions and disagreements as long as they don't get ugly.

Rankings are opinions and people are free to suggest and/or ignore rankings as they like.

by jklinsmann 08/11/11, 10:48 pm

Big tournament weekend coming up. Lot's of us will be on the edge of our seats waiting for the results. Anybody want to get anything off their chest now in order to avoid scrutiny after the fact? Just trying to avoid things like the following:

- We had multiple '05's playing so technically we did not lose.
- Our best player(s) were missing.
- We are used to playing 9 v 9 and 7 v 7 is a totally different game.
- When we play 7 v 7, we have to sit too many good players while you get away with not having as much depth.

Here's to a great weekend!

by Soccer135 09/11/11, 12:00 am

Cosmos '04 White - 1
Solar Red Crushers - 0

by pettyyack 09/11/11, 01:34 am

1.Danglish
2.Solar Kenn
3.Rosalas
4.TBG 4B Rowdies

MY OPINION- Rosalas beat the rowdies and solar in SDL play- Rowdies lost to Rosalas and TBG, beat solar, then beat TBG when TBG took it as an honor to play such a good team again in league play- Solar lost to DTN and Rowdies and beat TBG- TBG tied Rosalas, beat the rowdies then lost to the rowdies and lost to solar- TBG played the top 3 teams 4 weeks straight instead of playing a team lower in the standings.. in my opinion all the teams can beat each other any given day and this proves it..

by go99 09/11/11, 04:27 am

jklinsman wrote:Big tournament weekend coming up. Lot's of us will be on the edge of our seats waiting for the results. Anybody want to get anything off their chest now in order to avoid scrutiny after the fact? Just trying to avoid things like the following:

- We had multiple '05's playing so technically we did not lose.
- Our best player(s) were missing.
- We are used to playing 9 v 9 and 7 v 7 is a totally different game.
- When we play 7 v 7, we have to sit too many good players while you get away with not having as much depth.

Here's to a great weekend!

Hey where you been JK? We missed you. Guess you been out working on that post.
- I think we will only have 1 05
- Our best players are supposed to be there
- We are used to playing 9v9 but managed to get a 7v7 game in and they looked ok
- Not carrying as many girls this weekend so playtime should be okay and yes 9v9 does take more depth

Don't worry JK I am sure you guys will beat us at something, one day! Very Happy

by DEUCEE'Sdaddy 09/11/11, 07:38 am

kellersoccerdad wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:
Moosh98 wrote:
DEUCEE'Sdaddy wrote:The Only "Problem" w/Dalglish is the Insistence of their Parents on Being Ranked as on '04 Squad, while Playing '03's...If U're Playing '03's Primarily, THAT's Where You Should Be Ranked...

Beating Mid or Lower Level '03's SHOULDN'T Carry Tooo Much Weight in an '04 Specific Ranking...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

If an 05 team was to beat Keegan, Tx Spirit North, Beardsley and DTS in the 04s, would that not carry any weight for their rankings in the 05s?
Depends on how that '05 Fared Against the Rowdies, TBG, Solar-Kennington & Rosales...Not to Mention How that Same '05 Squad Fared Against Other '05's

What YOU'RE Basically Saying is, "Dalglish MUST Be the Best '04 Team, Because we Compete w/Mid & Lower Level '03's"...But that's NOT Necessarily a Factual Statement...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

Thats nice. keep saying "mid and lower level" We have played many teams in the top 10 and top 5. but anyway.... my point was actually about simply being RANKED in their own age group, not WHERE they are ranked in that age group
I'm Honestly NOT Trying to Piss You or Anybody Else Off Here, but this is a Clear Case of HAVING your Cake & Wanting to EAT it Too...

Have ya'll BEATEN Any Elite Level '03's???...Serious Question???..."Playing" & "Beating" are Entirely Different Matters, Especially when you're Campaigning for a High Ranking in a Different Age Bracket...

DEUCEE'sdaddy

Let's see how the weekend plays out, DEUCEE'sdaddy. Y'all get your shot at Dalglish first.

Should B a Fun Game, but I Don't Expect it to Influence Where Texas Spirit North is Ranked, 1 Way or the Other...We've Proven to Be a Middle of the Pack Team, just BELOW the Elite...If/When we Start BEATING the Big Dogs Consistently, we Can Revisit the Matter...

It'll Be Cool to Add Dalglish to the List of Elite Level Teams that we've Played...

DEUCEE'Sdaddy Cool

by go99 09/11/11, 07:52 am

Should be a fun game. I hear your DD is one hell of a player. Will be fun to see her play

by DEUCEE'Sdaddy 09/11/11, 10:33 am

I Appreciate the Compliment...We've Got a Talented Little Team...We just Need to Work on Consistency...

DEUCEE'Sdaddy Cool

by jklinsmann 10/11/11, 09:34 pm

go99 wrote:
jklinsman wrote:Big tournament weekend coming up. Lot's of us will be on the edge of our seats waiting for the results. Anybody want to get anything off their chest now in order to avoid scrutiny after the fact? Just trying to avoid things like the following:

- We had multiple '05's playing so technically we did not lose.
- Our best player(s) were missing.
- We are used to playing 9 v 9 and 7 v 7 is a totally different game.
- When we play 7 v 7, we have to sit too many good players while you get away with not having as much depth.

Here's to a great weekend!

Hey where you been JK? We missed you. Guess you been out working on that post.
- I think we will only have 1 05
- Our best players are supposed to be there
- We are used to playing 9v9 but managed to get a 7v7 game in and they looked ok
- Not carrying as many girls this weekend so playtime should be okay and yes 9v9 does take more depth

Don't worry JK I am sure you guys will beat us at something, one day!

Super Busy lately, but I try to make time to catch up on latest when I can. Good luck to all this weekend. I am looking forward to seeing how things play out.

by Sponsored content

Join Heath Soccer Academy (Rockwall area)	29/08/24, 10:58 pm	socroc
Join Heath Soccer Academy (Rockwall area)	29/08/24, 11:02 am	socroc
09/10 COMPETITIVE TEAM IN ROCKWALL AREA	17/08/24, 02:26 am	Jumpman
Last call Solar 09/10 Rockwall	22/07/24, 10:48 am	socroc
Last call Solar 09 Rockwall	22/07/24, 10:15 am	socroc
Solar 09 NPL NTX (Rockwall)	15/07/24, 08:15 pm	socroc
Solar 09 NPL NTX (Rockwall)	15/07/24, 06:35 pm	socroc
Solar 09 NPL NTX (Rockwall)	15/07/24, 05:18 pm	socroc
Solar 09 NPL NTX (Rockwall)	26/06/24, 10:29 am	socroc
2008G Dallas Texans Tryouts (Final 1-2 spots)	26/06/24, 10:20 am	Dallas Texans East
2008G Dallas Texans Tryouts	26/06/24, 09:52 am	Dallas Texans East
Solar 07 Spear DII Classic League	25/06/24, 01:42 pm	socroc
Solar 06B RL and DI Classic	25/06/24, 01:34 pm	socroc
RSC 11' GCL w/Coach Adam	23/06/24, 01:15 pm	acst
Oh Yeah! movin' on UP 09's	23/06/24, 09:58 am	acst
Open Practice	20/06/24, 10:00 am	Coach Jim
BvB '06 Gold D-1 Coach Chris Obara formerly with Ayses	17/06/24, 11:18 am	BiroBiro
Renegades 2016G and 2017G North Blanton	16/06/24, 06:30 pm	tareyncarol
FCP Dynamos 2010B - Looking For Players	16/06/24, 05:02 pm	fcpcoach
Solar 2014B Williams - White - Needing 2 more players	09/06/24, 02:39 pm	Marvelousmar
RSC ELITE CAC	09/06/24, 12:10 pm	acst
RSC 08Clark	02/06/24, 05:43 pm	acst
Sting 2011 Boys ECNL RL NTX	02/06/24, 06:17 am	Jumpman
NTX Celtic 2011B ECNL-RL-NTX Opportunity	01/06/24, 11:04 pm	FSFFL
NTX Celtic 06/07G ECNL-RL-NTX Opportunity	01/06/24, 10:49 pm	FSFFL