'02 FBR Rankings - 03-27-02

javajake wrote:Well done! Just seems like DT Higg should get on the list because we know darn well that they are out there, lurking like a great white shark off the coast of the Hamptons, ready to eat a lot of lesser teams in one fierce bite. Does anyone know how they are doing in the boys SDL division? Why not put them in at 5th which is probably too low but it is where they were last, with a Barry Bonds asterisk, and leave them there so that the view is a bit more accurate? What do you think?

soccerinsane wrote:

javajake wrote:Well done! Just seems like DT Higg should get on the list because we know darn well that they are out there, lurking like a great white shark off the coast of the Hamptons, ready to eat a lot of lesser teams in one fierce bite. Does anyone know how they are doing in the boys SDL division? Why not put them in at 5th which is probably too low but it is where they were last, with a Barry Bonds asterisk, and leave them there so that the view is a bit more accurate? What do you think?

Ha! Very nice. And I tend to agree--I added them in mentally anyway. Have not heard how they're doing. Has anyone looked to see if the boys side of things has as crazy of parents as us? Maybe they've posted scores.

OOrah wrote:

soccerinsane wrote:

javajake wrote:Well done! Just seems like DT Higg should get on the list because we know darn well that they are out there, lurking like a great white shark off the coast of the Hamptons, ready to eat a lot of lesser teams in one fierce bite. Does anyone know how they are doing in the boys SDL division? Why not put them in at 5th which is probably too low but it is where they were last, with a Barry Bonds asterisk, and leave them there so that the view is a bit more accurate? What do you think?

Ha! Very nice. And I tend to agree--I added them in mentally anyway. Have not heard how they're doing. Has anyone looked to see if the boys side of things has as crazy of parents as us? Maybe they've posted scores.

Heard Higgenbotham girls all now have assigned Texans strength trainers, agility trainers, skills trainers, and a okinawa-te sensei, in addition to the 3 team coaches. The new goal is for the team to win three age brackets next year while serving as a backup to Seal Team 6 in case it heats up in Bandar-e Abbas.

Word is Operation DD-Warrior is paying off. Here is a picture of a couple Higg players from a satellite spy cam over ross stewart fields:

pringlelover wrote:Have a connection on a boy team that they played last week and the parent said they (TeXans) gave the suprised boys a good game winning 4-2, boys did not know what to think. He heard they have won all their games but I'm not sure if that is accurate or not. And Im not sure the level of boys they are playing.
He did say they had big brutal girls who pass and score well and can shoot the ball hard . He said at times seemed to be a little confusion in the back . But they looked strong offensively, in the middle and at back overall. He thought they looked conditioned and did not tire as quickly as the boys. .
Keep in mind he has boys, so no girl experience to compare them to. While I'm sure they did fine BUT I'm sure FCD and SRSA and high ranked teams would do well in boys' league also.I think at this age the gap between boys and girls is not that wide yet.
That is just what I have heard through the soccer grapevine.

OOrah wrote:

pringlelover wrote:Have a connection on a boy team that they played last week and the parent said they (TeXans) gave the suprised boys a good game winning 4-2, boys did not know what to think. He heard they have won all their games but I'm not sure if that is accurate or not. And Im not sure the level of boys they are playing.
He did say they had big brutal girls who pass and score well and can shoot the ball hard . He said at times seemed to be a little confusion in the back . But they looked strong offensively, in the middle and at back overall. He thought they looked conditioned and did not tire as quickly as the boys. .
Keep in mind he has boys, so no girl experience to compare them to. While I'm sure they did fine BUT I'm sure FCD and SRSA and high ranked teams would do well in boys' league also.I think at this age the gap between boys and girls is not that wide yet.
That is just what I have heard through the soccer grapevine.

Someone off the Higg team just emailed me this picture of training inside the texans dojo. She is a 99 on the team code named Anarchy, training for boys soccer:

bwgophers wrote:

OOrah wrote:

pringlelover wrote:Have a connection on a boy team that they played last week and the parent said they (TeXans) gave the suprised boys a good game winning 4-2, boys did not know what to think. He heard they have won all their games but I'm not sure if that is accurate or not. And Im not sure the level of boys they are playing.
He did say they had big brutal girls who pass and score well and can shoot the ball hard . He said at times seemed to be a little confusion in the back . But they looked strong offensively, in the middle and at back overall. He thought they looked conditioned and did not tire as quickly as the boys. .
Keep in mind he has boys, so no girl experience to compare them to. While I'm sure they did fine BUT I'm sure FCD and SRSA and high ranked teams would do well in boys' league also.I think at this age the gap between boys and girls is not that wide yet.
That is just what I have heard through the soccer grapevine.

Someone off the Higg team just emailed me this picture of training inside the texans dojo. She is a 99 on the team code named Anarchy, training for boys soccer:

Heard they've hired a H.S. kid from Lewisville, S.C. to help with the training...

Uh oh... see what I just did there??? I crossed the threads... Beware of the ensuing total protonic reversal...

OOrah wrote:

bwgophers wrote:

OOrah wrote:

pringlelover wrote:Have a connection on a boy team that they played last week and the parent said they (TeXans) gave the suprised boys a good game winning 4-2, boys did not know what to think. He heard they have won all their games but I'm not sure if that is accurate or not. And Im not sure the level of boys they are playing.
He did say they had big brutal girls who pass and score well and can shoot the ball hard . He said at times seemed to be a little confusion in the back . But they looked strong offensively, in the middle and at back overall. He thought they looked conditioned and did not tire as quickly as the boys. .
Keep in mind he has boys, so no girl experience to compare them to. While I'm sure they did fine BUT I'm sure FCD and SRSA and high ranked teams would do well in boys' league also.I think at this age the gap between boys and girls is not that wide yet.
That is just what I have heard through the soccer grapevine.

Someone off the Higg team just emailed me this picture of training inside the texans dojo. She is a 99 on the team code named Anarchy, training for boys soccer:

Heard they've hired a H.S. kid from Lewisville, S.C. to help with the training...

Uh oh... see what I just did there??? I crossed the threads... Beware of the ensuing total protonic reversal...

In case anyone is stupid, I am just kidding.

But this incident is whacked!
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/highschool-prep-rally/south-carolina-teen-brutal-soccer-attack-earns-assault-103322121.html
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/highschool-prep-rally/south-carolina-teen-brutal-soccer-attack-earns-assault-103322121.html

Still, you did cross the streams and here is the result

Slim wrote:Someone sent me this picture of Higgy visiting with the new center forward he just recruited to help beat these boys teams and for the QT!

bwgophers wrote:Two sets of rankings this week...

The set on the left reflects the changes from the last rankings I published on 3/7/12, including Nov/Dec tournament results. The point and rank changes are the changes from the 3/7/12 rankings.

The set on the right is after removing all Nov/Dec tourney data from the database. The rankings are based solely on performance in games played since Jan. 1, 2012. Going forward I will build on this database up until signing day. The point and rank changes are the changes from the set of rankings on the left.

My apologies for how the image came out. I shrank the image size so that I could fit the rankings side by side in the forum pane, and by doing so, the text is displaying "fuzzy" for some reason.

p.s. Yes, I know that DT Higginbotham is missing from the rankings on the right. They have not played any games against '02 girls teams since Jan. 1, so I have no results to rank them with.
B


Intra-Tier Records (Since Jan. 1, 2012)

Guest wrote:

bwgophers wrote:Two sets of rankings this week...

The set on the left reflects the changes from the last rankings I published on 3/7/12, including Nov/Dec tournament results. The point and rank changes are the changes from the 3/7/12 rankings.

The set on the right is after removing all Nov/Dec tourney data from the database. The rankings are based solely on performance in games played since Jan. 1, 2012. Going forward I will build on this database up until signing day. The point and rank changes are the changes from the set of rankings on the left.

My apologies for how the image came out. I shrank the image size so that I could fit the rankings side by side in the forum pane, and by doing so, the text is displaying "fuzzy" for some reason.

p.s. Yes, I know that DT Higginbotham is missing from the rankings on the right. They have not played any games against '02 girls teams since Jan. 1, so I have no results to rank them with.
B


Intra-Tier Records (Since Jan. 1, 2012)

Guest wrote:

bwgophers wrote:Two sets of rankings this week...

The set on the left reflects the changes from the last rankings I published on 3/7/12, including Nov/Dec tournament results. The point and rank changes are the changes from the 3/7/12 rankings.

The set on the right is after removing all Nov/Dec tourney data from the database. The rankings are based solely on performance in games played since Jan. 1, 2012. Going forward I will build on this database up until signing day. The point and rank changes are the changes from the set of rankings on the left.

My apologies for how the image came out. I shrank the image size so that I could fit the rankings side by side in the forum pane, and by doing so, the text is displaying "fuzzy" for some reason.

p.s. Yes, I know that DT Higginbotham is missing from the rankings on the right. They have not played any games against '02 girls teams since Jan. 1, so I have no results to rank them with.
B


Intra-Tier Records (Since Jan. 1, 2012)

RoidRage wrote:

Guest wrote:

bwgophers wrote:Two sets of rankings this week...

The set on the left reflects the changes from the last rankings I published on 3/7/12, including Nov/Dec tournament results. The point and rank changes are the changes from the 3/7/12 rankings.

The set on the right is after removing all Nov/Dec tourney data from the database. The rankings are based solely on performance in games played since Jan. 1, 2012. Going forward I will build on this database up until signing day. The point and rank changes are the changes from the set of rankings on the left.

My apologies for how the image came out. I shrank the image size so that I could fit the rankings side by side in the forum pane, and by doing so, the text is displaying "fuzzy" for some reason.

p.s. Yes, I know that DT Higginbotham is missing from the rankings on the right. They have not played any games against '02 girls teams since Jan. 1, so I have no results to rank them with.
B


Intra-Tier Records (Since Jan. 1, 2012)

About time the moderater banned him.

TheEasterBunny wrote:Found it! The actual PM from Thumperhulk himself. Enjoy


The Easter Bunny wins... - Today at 12:58 am
You should know that my existance here has merely been a prank intended to get reaction, not to impact anyone in their real existance and it went on a bit too long. I have no horse of any kind in the race of girls soccer and no true reason to participate on this forum. You will not hear from me again. Apologies. If you would be kind enough to delete your last post it would be appreciated. Thanks. I'm history...


He only wanted me to delete the post because his initials and the city he lived in were in the post. Got Heeeeeeeem!