How about a human poll/BCS to get everyone's 02 opinions out there?

List your top 20 teams for 02 girls: (in your opinion...no copying. lol)
02Dad will combine them 50/50 with the FBR's to create the BCS rankings.

1. Manchester City
2. Manchester United
3. Chelsea
4. Newcastle United
5. Tottenham Hotspur
6. Liverpool
7. Arsenal
8. Norwich City
9. Stoke City
10. Queens Park Rangers
11. Aston Villa
12. West Bromwich Albion
13. Everton
14. Sunderland
15. Swansea City
16. Wolverhampton Wanderers
17. Fulham
18. Bolton Wanderers
19. Wigan Athletic
20. Blackburn Rovers

oldboot wrote:1. Manchester City
2. Manchester United
3. Chelsea
4. Newcastle United
5. Tottenham Hotspur
6. Liverpool
7. Arsenal
8. Norwich City
9. Stoke City
10. Queens Park Rangers
11. Aston Villa
12. West Bromwich Albion
13. Everton
14. Sunderland
15. Swansea City
16. Wolverhampton Wanderers
17. Fulham
18. Bolton Wanderers
19. Wigan Athletic
20. Blackburn Rovers

How many 02girls in this bunch you list above? (some would probably say a few, huh?)

And to think I had my dog all prepared for a canine poll...

HUMAN POLE

There are several people in this world that I find unbearably obnoxious, and you are all of them.

Now, you know what I mean, let's get on with this so I can see BCS ranks.

Here's mine:

1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT-Bennett
5. DT South-Adames
6. DT-Rangel
7. Dynamo
8. D'Feet
9. Waco Blast
10. Fever Red
11. Polaris
12. FCD-Renfro
13. Sting-Searls
14. DT-Vigil
15. TX Spirit North
16. Fever White
17. TFC Elite
18. Solar East
19. Solar-Gio
20. Sting West-Okeefe

1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT-Bennett
5. DT South-Adames
6. DT-Rangel
7. Dynamo
8. D'Feet
9. Fever red
10. Polaris
11. Waco Blast
12. FCD-Renfro
13. Sting-Searls
14. DT-Vigil
15. TX Spirit North
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Solar East
19. Sting west Okeefe
20. Fever White

1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

WOW, was DT-Bennett left out by mistake or are you making a prediction?

justsayin02 wrote:

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

WOW, was DT-Bennett left out by mistake or are you making a prediction?

Based on the potential loss of the 6 players (with 2 already at higgy)and not sure what is going on over there I left them out. If everything is fine then I would put them at 4 and then bump everyone down one.

1.DT HIGG
2.FCD GRUBB
3.SOLAR WEBB
4.DT BENNETT
5.DT ADAMES SOUTH
6.DT RANGEL
7.DYNAMO
8.D'FEET
9.WACO BLAST
10.FEVER RED
11.POLARIS
12.DYNASTY
13.FCD RENFRO
14.STING SEARLS
15.DT VIGIL
16.TX SPIRIT NORTH
17.FEVER WHITE
18.TFC ELITE
19.STING WEST O'KEEFE
20.SOLAR JONES

whysoccer wrote:1.DT HIGG
2.FCD GRUBB
3.SOLAR WEBB
4.DT BENNETT
5.DT ADAMES SOUTH
6.DT RANGEL
7.DYNAMO
8.D'FEET
9.WACO BLAST
10.FEVER RED
11.POLARIS
12.DYNASTY
13.FCD RENFRO
14.STING SEARLS
15.DT VIGIL
16.TX SPIRIT NORTH
17.FEVER WHITE
18.TFC ELITE
19.STING WEST O'KEEFE
20.SOLAR JONES

Where do Solar Jones and Dynasty play? I've heard of Jones but never seen or heard of Dynasty. Please, no offence intended so dont jump down my throat. Just wondering how they are getting ranked with teams they do not play.

spacebrain wrote:

Where do Solar Jones and Dynasty play? I've heard of Jones but never seen or heard of Dynasty. Please, no offence intended so dont jump down my throat. Just wondering how they are getting ranked with teams they do not play.

Coming to a theater near you...
Solar Jones, action hero.

spacebrain wrote:

whysoccer wrote:1.DT HIGG
2.FCD GRUBB
3.SOLAR WEBB
4.DT BENNETT
5.DT ADAMES SOUTH
6.DT RANGEL
7.DYNAMO
8.D'FEET
9.WACO BLAST
10.FEVER RED
11.POLARIS
12.DYNASTY
13.FCD RENFRO
14.STING SEARLS
15.DT VIGIL
16.TX SPIRIT NORTH
17.FEVER WHITE
18.TFC ELITE
19.STING WEST O'KEEFE
20.SOLAR JONES

Where do Solar Jones and Dynasty play? I've heard of Jones but never seen or heard of Dynasty. Please, no offence intended so dont jump down my throat. Just wondering how they are getting ranked with teams they do not play.

PAL I believe.

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Nice job hardtruth. Your omission of DT Bennett has good cause, if all the rumors are true. I just wonder if they would be #4 knowing that at minimum, 2 players have left to the stronger team. Leads you to believe they are two of Bennetts better players. Anyone from Bennett care to comment and clear things up.

Also, your ranking of 5 through 10 is much more realistic than all of these other rankings. Moving Fever up and Rangel down is right on point. I have seen Fever play a few times at PTCL and they are a good team, that just struggles finishing. They dominated the parts of the games that I saw, ( tie Feet, beat Sting) and passed the ball much better than (Webb and Bennett), just my observation, both 1 to 0 games that Fever should have at least tied. I did see that they scored 5 times in their last game, so maybe they have figured something out. Also, I remember they beat Rangel in the Labor Day Tournament.

Dynamo has some of the same issues Fever has. Great ball movement but very few goals scored off of that great ball movement. Size hurts them a little right now as well. When these girls hit their growth spurt, they will be legit.

Sting Searls, from what I saw, really improved over the course of the PTCL season. Playing against the top competition appears to help.


1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT-Bennett
5. DT South-Adames
6. DT-Rangel
7. Dynamo
8. D'Feet
9. Fever red
10. FCD-Renfro Red
11. Polaris
12. Sting-Searls
13. Waco Blast
14. TX Spirit North
15. DT-Vigil
16. Dynasty
17. Solar East
18. Solar Gio
19. TFC Elite
20. Sting west Okeefe

passthedarnball wrote:

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Nice job hardtruth. Your omission of DT Bennett has good cause, if all the rumors are true. I just wonder if they would be #4 knowing that at minimum, 2 players have left to the stronger team. Leads you to believe they are two of Bennetts better players. Anyone from Bennett care to comment and clear things up.

Also, your ranking of 5 through 10 is much more realistic than all of these other rankings. Moving Fever up and Rangel down is right on point. I have seen Fever play a few times at PTCL and they are a good team, that just struggles finishing. They dominated the parts of the games that I saw, ( tie Feet, beat Sting) and passed the ball much better than (Webb and Bennett), just my observation, both 1 to 0 games that Fever should have at least tied. I did see that they scored 5 times in their last game, so maybe they have figured something out. Also, I remember they beat Rangel in the Labor Day Tournament.

Dynamo has some of the same issues Fever has. Great ball movement but very few goals scored off of that great ball movement. Size hurts them a little right now as well. When these girls hit their growth spurt, they will be legit.

Sting Searls, from what I saw, really improved over the course of the PTCL season. Playing against the top competition appears to help.


1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Then why not move Dynamo down and Rangel up as the last 2 time those 2 matched up in August Rangel beat Dynamo and tied them?

When Rangel matched up against Fever at PLT Fever had guest players and Rangel was using their true roster. Fever got lucky on a ref not calling an offsides that resulted a goal. These 2 teams are very equally matched and can go either direction any given day.

I've been told I have a pretty good human poll.

jen_nah wrote:

passthedarnball wrote:

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Nice job hardtruth. Your omission of DT Bennett has good cause, if all the rumors are true. I just wonder if they would be #4 knowing that at minimum, 2 players have left to the stronger team. Leads you to believe they are two of Bennetts better players. Anyone from Bennett care to comment and clear things up.

Also, your ranking of 5 through 10 is much more realistic than all of these other rankings. Moving Fever up and Rangel down is right on point. I have seen Fever play a few times at PTCL and they are a good team, that just struggles finishing. They dominated the parts of the games that I saw, ( tie Feet, beat Sting) and passed the ball much better than (Webb and Bennett), just my observation, both 1 to 0 games that Fever should have at least tied. I did see that they scored 5 times in their last game, so maybe they have figured something out. Also, I remember they beat Rangel in the Labor Day Tournament.

Dynamo has some of the same issues Fever has. Great ball movement but very few goals scored off of that great ball movement. Size hurts them a little right now as well. When these girls hit their growth spurt, they will be legit.

Sting Searls, from what I saw, really improved over the course of the PTCL season. Playing against the top competition appears to help.


1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Then why not move Dynamo down and Rangel up as the last 2 time those 2 matched up in August Rangel beat Dynamo and tied them?

When Rangel matched up against Fever at PLT Fever had guest players and Rangel was using their true roster. Fever got lucky on a ref not calling an offsides that resulted a goal. These 2 teams are very equally matched and can go either direction any given day.

Fever parent here to clean things up a bit. First off, Fever wasn't using guest players. Those were all Fever girls out there. Second, most of the game was played on the Rangel side of the field. And third, the goal was scored by a player dribbling through a few defenders and shooting. There was no offsides there. I believe the reason passthedarnball and hardtruth dropped them a little is because of their strength of Fall schedule. Dynamo and Fever have had a MUCH tougher Fall schedule. Rangel is a good team and maybe could move to #7, but I think the strength of schedule should have more importance in the FBR. Jennah, it's no big deal, the FBR still has you ranked higher. Be happy about that.

jen_nah wrote:

passthedarnball wrote:

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Nice job hardtruth. Your omission of DT Bennett has good cause, if all the rumors are true. I just wonder if they would be #4 knowing that at minimum, 2 players have left to the stronger team. Leads you to believe they are two of Bennetts better players. Anyone from Bennett care to comment and clear things up.

Also, your ranking of 5 through 10 is much more realistic than all of these other rankings. Moving Fever up and Rangel down is right on point. I have seen Fever play a few times at PTCL and they are a good team, that just struggles finishing. They dominated the parts of the games that I saw, ( tie Feet, beat Sting) and passed the ball much better than (Webb and Bennett), just my observation, both 1 to 0 games that Fever should have at least tied. I did see that they scored 5 times in their last game, so maybe they have figured something out. Also, I remember they beat Rangel in the Labor Day Tournament.

Dynamo has some of the same issues Fever has. Great ball movement but very few goals scored off of that great ball movement. Size hurts them a little right now as well. When these girls hit their growth spurt, they will be legit.

Sting Searls, from what I saw, really improved over the course of the PTCL season. Playing against the top competition appears to help.


1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Then why not move Dynamo down and Rangel up as the last 2 time those 2 matched up in August Rangel beat Dynamo and tied them?

When Rangel matched up against Fever at PLT Fever had guest players and Rangel was using their true roster. Fever got lucky on a ref not calling an offsides that resulted a goal. These 2 teams are very equally matched and can go either direction any given day.

Ummmm, didn't Rangel have 2-3 Glotz/Bennett girls guesting against Dynamo in August? If so, you might be contradicting yourself a bit on your Fever point.

vwrocket wrote:

jen_nah wrote:

passthedarnball wrote:

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Nice job hardtruth. Your omission of DT Bennett has good cause, if all the rumors are true. I just wonder if they would be #4 knowing that at minimum, 2 players have left to the stronger team. Leads you to believe they are two of Bennetts better players. Anyone from Bennett care to comment and clear things up.

Also, your ranking of 5 through 10 is much more realistic than all of these other rankings. Moving Fever up and Rangel down is right on point. I have seen Fever play a few times at PTCL and they are a good team, that just struggles finishing. They dominated the parts of the games that I saw, ( tie Feet, beat Sting) and passed the ball much better than (Webb and Bennett), just my observation, both 1 to 0 games that Fever should have at least tied. I did see that they scored 5 times in their last game, so maybe they have figured something out. Also, I remember they beat Rangel in the Labor Day Tournament.

Dynamo has some of the same issues Fever has. Great ball movement but very few goals scored off of that great ball movement. Size hurts them a little right now as well. When these girls hit their growth spurt, they will be legit.

Sting Searls, from what I saw, really improved over the course of the PTCL season. Playing against the top competition appears to help.


1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Then why not move Dynamo down and Rangel up as the last 2 time those 2 matched up in August Rangel beat Dynamo and tied them?

When Rangel matched up against Fever at PLT Fever had guest players and Rangel was using their true roster. Fever got lucky on a ref not calling an offsides that resulted a goal. These 2 teams are very equally matched and can go either direction any given day.

Ummmm, didn't Rangel have 2-3 Glotz/Bennett girls guesting against Dynamo in August? If so, you might be contradicting yourself a bit on your Fever point.

I believe they did, however Dynamo had guest players as well. I am not sure which team they were from though. Just remember guesting is fine and should not be used as a reason that a win is any less. Just enjoy guesting now because it is all about to change come the end of the spring season.

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:

vwrocket wrote:

jen_nah wrote:

passthedarnball wrote:

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Nice job hardtruth. Your omission of DT Bennett has good cause, if all the rumors are true. I just wonder if they would be #4 knowing that at minimum, 2 players have left to the stronger team. Leads you to believe they are two of Bennetts better players. Anyone from Bennett care to comment and clear things up.

Also, your ranking of 5 through 10 is much more realistic than all of these other rankings. Moving Fever up and Rangel down is right on point. I have seen Fever play a few times at PTCL and they are a good team, that just struggles finishing. They dominated the parts of the games that I saw, ( tie Feet, beat Sting) and passed the ball much better than (Webb and Bennett), just my observation, both 1 to 0 games that Fever should have at least tied. I did see that they scored 5 times in their last game, so maybe they have figured something out. Also, I remember they beat Rangel in the Labor Day Tournament.

Dynamo has some of the same issues Fever has. Great ball movement but very few goals scored off of that great ball movement. Size hurts them a little right now as well. When these girls hit their growth spurt, they will be legit.

Sting Searls, from what I saw, really improved over the course of the PTCL season. Playing against the top competition appears to help.


1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Then why not move Dynamo down and Rangel up as the last 2 time those 2 matched up in August Rangel beat Dynamo and tied them?

When Rangel matched up against Fever at PLT Fever had guest players and Rangel was using their true roster. Fever got lucky on a ref not calling an offsides that resulted a goal. These 2 teams are very equally matched and can go either direction any given day.

Ummmm, didn't Rangel have 2-3 Glotz/Bennett girls guesting against Dynamo in August? If so, you might be contradicting yourself a bit on your Fever point.

I believe they did, however Dynamo had guest players as well. I am not sure which team they were from though. Just remember guesting is fine and should not be used as a reason that a win is any less. Just enjoy guesting now because it is all about to change come the end of the spring season.

I think some Dynamo girls guest for another team...not the other way around.

soccernovice40 wrote:

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:

vwrocket wrote:

jen_nah wrote:

passthedarnball wrote:

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Nice job hardtruth. Your omission of DT Bennett has good cause, if all the rumors are true. I just wonder if they would be #4 knowing that at minimum, 2 players have left to the stronger team. Leads you to believe they are two of Bennetts better players. Anyone from Bennett care to comment and clear things up.

Also, your ranking of 5 through 10 is much more realistic than all of these other rankings. Moving Fever up and Rangel down is right on point. I have seen Fever play a few times at PTCL and they are a good team, that just struggles finishing. They dominated the parts of the games that I saw, ( tie Feet, beat Sting) and passed the ball much better than (Webb and Bennett), just my observation, both 1 to 0 games that Fever should have at least tied. I did see that they scored 5 times in their last game, so maybe they have figured something out. Also, I remember they beat Rangel in the Labor Day Tournament.

Dynamo has some of the same issues Fever has. Great ball movement but very few goals scored off of that great ball movement. Size hurts them a little right now as well. When these girls hit their growth spurt, they will be legit.

Sting Searls, from what I saw, really improved over the course of the PTCL season. Playing against the top competition appears to help.


1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Then why not move Dynamo down and Rangel up as the last 2 time those 2 matched up in August Rangel beat Dynamo and tied them?

When Rangel matched up against Fever at PLT Fever had guest players and Rangel was using their true roster. Fever got lucky on a ref not calling an offsides that resulted a goal. These 2 teams are very equally matched and can go either direction any given day.

Ummmm, didn't Rangel have 2-3 Glotz/Bennett girls guesting against Dynamo in August? If so, you might be contradicting yourself a bit on your Fever point.

I believe they did, however Dynamo had guest players as well. I am not sure which team they were from though. Just remember guesting is fine and should not be used as a reason that a win is any less. Just enjoy guesting now because it is all about to change come the end of the spring season.

I think some Dynamo girls guest for another team...not the other way around.

I meant for that tournament in August. But I believe you are correct that Dynamo has some girls that guest on other teams.

tmcc wrote:

jen_nah wrote:

passthedarnball wrote:

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Nice job hardtruth. Your omission of DT Bennett has good cause, if all the rumors are true. I just wonder if they would be #4 knowing that at minimum, 2 players have left to the stronger team. Leads you to believe they are two of Bennetts better players. Anyone from Bennett care to comment and clear things up.

Also, your ranking of 5 through 10 is much more realistic than all of these other rankings. Moving Fever up and Rangel down is right on point. I have seen Fever play a few times at PTCL and they are a good team, that just struggles finishing. They dominated the parts of the games that I saw, ( tie Feet, beat Sting) and passed the ball much better than (Webb and Bennett), just my observation, both 1 to 0 games that Fever should have at least tied. I did see that they scored 5 times in their last game, so maybe they have figured something out. Also, I remember they beat Rangel in the Labor Day Tournament.

Dynamo has some of the same issues Fever has. Great ball movement but very few goals scored off of that great ball movement. Size hurts them a little right now as well. When these girls hit their growth spurt, they will be legit.

Sting Searls, from what I saw, really improved over the course of the PTCL season. Playing against the top competition appears to help.


1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Then why not move Dynamo down and Rangel up as the last 2 time those 2 matched up in August Rangel beat Dynamo and tied them?

When Rangel matched up against Fever at PLT Fever had guest players and Rangel was using their true roster. Fever got lucky on a ref not calling an offsides that resulted a goal. These 2 teams are very equally matched and can go either direction any given day.

Fever parent here to clean things up a bit. First off, Fever wasn't using guest players. Those were all Fever girls out there. Second, most of the game was played on the Rangel side of the field. And third, the goal was scored by a player dribbling through a few defenders and shooting. There was no offsides there. I believe the reason passthedarnball and hardtruth dropped them a little is because of their strength of Fall schedule. Dynamo and Fever have had a MUCH tougher Fall schedule. Rangel is a good team and maybe could move to #7, but I think the strength of schedule should have more importance in the FBR. Jennah, it's no big deal, the FBR still has you ranked higher. Be happy about that.

It was an uncalled off-sides as your forward was behind our defenders when the pass happened. We will just agree to disagree. It's not like Fever kicked DTN butt our anything. It was a 1-0 loss with it being pretty equal for ball possession was equal and both teams had pretty equal shots on goal. DTN just couldn't finish our shots and had several go wide or over the goal. So again on any given day these 2 teams could come up with the win.

I could really care where we stand in FBR as it doesn't mean much at this point. I will really start caring come spring. I am just tired of hearing DTN is over ranked. We are a good solid team that has been together with very little player loss in 2yrs. They are making great improvement and work hard together. It's a great group of girls & parents with no tension or drama. Sure we need to work on our finishing but that is something they are working hard on and hope to keep seeing great improvement each week.

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:

soccernovice40 wrote:

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:

vwrocket wrote:

jen_nah wrote:

passthedarnball wrote:

hardtruthsoldier123 wrote:1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Nice job hardtruth. Your omission of DT Bennett has good cause, if all the rumors are true. I just wonder if they would be #4 knowing that at minimum, 2 players have left to the stronger team. Leads you to believe they are two of Bennetts better players. Anyone from Bennett care to comment and clear things up.

Also, your ranking of 5 through 10 is much more realistic than all of these other rankings. Moving Fever up and Rangel down is right on point. I have seen Fever play a few times at PTCL and they are a good team, that just struggles finishing. They dominated the parts of the games that I saw, ( tie Feet, beat Sting) and passed the ball much better than (Webb and Bennett), just my observation, both 1 to 0 games that Fever should have at least tied. I did see that they scored 5 times in their last game, so maybe they have figured something out. Also, I remember they beat Rangel in the Labor Day Tournament.

Dynamo has some of the same issues Fever has. Great ball movement but very few goals scored off of that great ball movement. Size hurts them a little right now as well. When these girls hit their growth spurt, they will be legit.

Sting Searls, from what I saw, really improved over the course of the PTCL season. Playing against the top competition appears to help.


1. DT-Higg
2. FCD Grubb
3. Solar Webb
4. DT South-Adames
5. Fever red
6. Dynamo
7. Waco Blast
8. Sting-Searls
9. DT-Rangel
10. Polaris
11. D'Feet
12. FCD-Renfro
13. TX Spirit North
14. Solar East
15. DT-Vigil
16. Solar Gio
17. TFC Elite
18. Sting west Okeefe
19. Fever White
20. Solar Jones

Then why not move Dynamo down and Rangel up as the last 2 time those 2 matched up in August Rangel beat Dynamo and tied them?

When Rangel matched up against Fever at PLT Fever had guest players and Rangel was using their true roster. Fever got lucky on a ref not calling an offsides that resulted a goal. These 2 teams are very equally matched and can go either direction any given day.

Ummmm, didn't Rangel have 2-3 Glotz/Bennett girls guesting against Dynamo in August? If so, you might be contradicting yourself a bit on your Fever point.

I believe they did, however Dynamo had guest players as well. I am not sure which team they were from though. Just remember guesting is fine and should not be used as a reason that a win is any less. Just enjoy guesting now because it is all about to change come the end of the spring season.

I think some Dynamo girls guest for another team...not the other way around.

I meant for that tournament in August. But I believe you are correct that Dynamo has some girls that guest on other teams.

Oh Dynamo did have guest players at that tourney Stark even acknowledged them as guesting at the trophy ceremony. We had 2 girls that are with Bennett but they had been playing with us all summer and had been on our PYL roster the whole time. So technically at that time they were on our roster for 3mths.